Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacob Bradshaw vs Niklas Schell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bradshaw vs Schell analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Bradshaw vs Niklas Schell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bradshaw 1 - 0 Schell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bradshaw has won 53% of points on their second serve, while Schell has won 48.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bradshaw, in recent form, has won 52.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schell has won 42.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.89% and 26.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bradshaw has saved 62.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schell has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bradshaw has won 54.79% of matches played (W/L 40/ 33), with Schell winning 30% (W/L 12/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 106/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Schell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 58/ 74).
- Player level: In the last year, Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.73% of matches (W/L 37/ 26), where as Schell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 31.58% of matches (W/L 12/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bradshaw winning 1 times and Schell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bradshaw winning 2 and Schell winning 0. The last match between Bradshaw and Schell was at the M15 Monastir, 15-05-2024, First, Hard with Jacob Bradshaw getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bradshaw and Schell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bradshaw winning 0 times and Schell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Bradshaw winning 2, and Schell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bradshaw has played against opponents with an average rank of 133.26 while Schell has played against players with an average rank of 150.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bradshaw has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schell has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bradshaw has converted 47.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schell has converted 40.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
549
Rank
548
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
864
Rank
714
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (110-74)
Career Total W/L
46% (130-151)
56% (18-14)
YTD W/L
25% (4-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jacob Bradshaw | Niklas Schell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:20:0 | 2:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (49/69) | 63% (65/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (38/49) | 69% (45/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (14/20) | 46% (18/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 18% (2/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (41/104) | 25% (17/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacob Bradshaw | Niklas Schell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (18/14) | 25% (4/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (39/30) | 28% (10/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (348/318) | 42% (145/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (18/13) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.49 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 84 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.54 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 92 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:41 | 1:51:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 135.25 | 176.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1256/2074) | 56% (623/1120) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (866/1256) | 66% (414/623) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (433/818) | 48% (240/497) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (88/192) | 41% (29/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (821/2074) | 33% (335/1028) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (17/9) | 25% (4/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | 20% (3/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 8% (12/1) |
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Flores
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Rushil Khosla
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Mohammad Alkotop
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Moritz Kudernatsch
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Niklas Schell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Niklas Schell
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
52)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(2) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
49%
(
45 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Niklas Schell
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Niklas Schell
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Lenny Petit
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
11
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Garcia Mestre
Player
Niklas Schell
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
41%
(
30 of
73)
0
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Niklas Schell
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Pieri
Player
Niklas Schell
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Bradshaw Vs Schell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bradshaw are available here and Schell photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Niklas Schell
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
